My Photo

Friends

« October 2004 | Main | December 2004 »

Why a college degree does not means as much as people think

Getting a college degree is not truly necessary and employers should stop requiring them for most jobs.

Most jobs that require a college degree only do so because so many people go to college nowadays and employers just use it as an easy way of discriminating in-favor of the "motivated". You don't really need a college agree to be a city clerk or a salesperson or even a software developer.

Among my circles the common question is "where did you go to college?" not "did you go to college?"

yes, a degree from a good school proves that you're smart and can be a good ticket. But other than that, how essential is college? -- especially if it is not from one of the most prestigious schools?

most things you learn in college you could learn on your own, or by taking a class or a seminar, or by joining a study group … or just by reading a book or looking it up on the Internet ...

yes, college is essential if you want to be a professor and it is necessary if you want to go to grad school (though I would agree that most masters degrees are unnecessary as well)

the college experience is very important in developing people socially and increasing maturity -- and also helping increase our drinking skills. But that is only true for the more elite 4-year universities -- not commuter schools where most people get their degrees. couldn't two years of national community service be much better for most people?

skills are important to learn: nursing, mechanics, dry wall, sales, putting together my computer, writing … all those things would give people a much better living then the typical college degree does

best education I ever got was the training I got on a summer job I had right after my senior year in high school. I went door to door for the environment asking for money. I learned how to make a sale in 6 seconds. You can't learn that at no college … we don't need no education ...

Books: How We Know What Isn't So

Review of How We Know What Isn't So by Thomas Gilovich

This is a book on bias and on prejudice and stereotyping.

Everyday we all make decisions by relying on our biases -- it is human nature. We misinterpret data, assume they are better then everyone else, and we believe what we are told.

This is a masterful book that Gilovich put together and I highly recommend it. First, the book is short. Second, it is the perfect companion to Influence: The Power of Persuasion (which is one of my favorite books of all time).

To really understand humans I suggest you read Influence, the Tipping Point, How We Know What Isn't So, and Why We Buy. I haven't yet read Gladwell's new book, Blink, but I suspect that one too (on whether you should trust your gut) might join these four important books as a must read.

Ukraine elections ... the sequel

My recent blog on the Ukrainian elections has been getting a lot of hits lately -- it is very timely.   Last year I was in Georgia, this year in Ukraine.   similar situations.   will the outcomes be similar?  too early to tell but I don't think it will happen.

i'm worried.   one always worries when hundreds of thousands of people protest in the freezing cold.   in means they're serious (as Kiev can get pretty chilly this time of year).   and the Yuschenko supporters are pitching tents and staying put.  for now.

we cannot afford to let Ukraine lapse into a civil war ... and yet we cannot afford to have its citizenry feel so unempowered.   so we wait and hope the sides come to a resolution as the alternative, a civil war, is not unlikely.   

see: Questions linger about Yuschenko's illness
see: Monitoring the Ukraine Presidential Election

Brown belt and black shoes -- why fashion is stupid and makes no sense

Why does fashion matter? I mean, what does it say about a person that is fashion coordinated? Only that the person spends a lot of time thinking about fashion. Is that such a good thing???

Why can't I wear a black belt with brown shoes or visa versa? Why is this such a faux-pas? And when I do this, why does everyone chastise me to no end?

And why can't I wear my blue faded jeans? How can a good pair of Levi's go out of style?

Fashion is stupid.

Whoa!! Do I dare say that? Yes … I'll even say it again … watch out … here it comes …

FASHION IS REALLY STUPID!!

Yeah. I can understand trying to look clean and presentable but why are ALL the men wearing those diagonal stripes these days? I mean is everyone a lemming and just needs to follow the oracle of the "trend"???

Ok … something else that bugs me .. Ties. I mean, what is the purpose of a tie except to suffocate you and to land in your lunch? I just do not understand the point. I mean, how did all of western society conform to such a stupid fashion? Don't we have an sense to change this fad?

Guess what else is stupid??? Grammar. And spelling. Huh? Yeah, Spelling. And table settings.

OK. I admit it. I don't know a thing about grammar. I never learned it. And frankly … I don't care. I'm sure this post will be riddled with grammatical errors … but guess what? You'll still understand what I am talking about. You'll understand me just fine.

So what's the big deal about grammar???

I find huge joy in ending my sentences with prepositions.

And spelling. So Dan Quayle spelled potato as "potatoe" -- so what's the big deal? Is there anyone who speaks English who doesn't know what he means? Spelling is really important to avoid confusion -- and so is grammar by the way -- but beyond that it as little value except to take a whole lot of brain power and to attempt to draw class distinctions -- neither of which is really useful to society.

And … while I am on a role … who really gives a hoot about which side to set the fork??? I mean, come on!!! There might occasionally be some practical purposes (like so you do not steal your neighbor's fork), but overall, table manners is a lot of hooey. When I'm at home alone … with no one else around … I like lick my plate. I mean, I just cooked something tasty, finished it, and there is some scraps on my plate (or in a bowl). So I lick it. Delicious. But I wouldn't dare do that in front of company (or even in front of my best friends) … I'd be an outcast, a pariah, a fool.

So I sit there, sitting on my hands, staring at this delicious plate … and I bemoan things fashionable that are not purposeful …

Book: The Oligarchs: Wealth and Power in the New Russia

The Oligarchs: Wealth and Power in the New Russia By David Hoffman

David Hoffman (no relation to me) is a masterful writer and he brings to life six characters that shaped Russia from its post-Communist days -- for better and for worse.

This book is similar to The Wise Men -- the men that shaped the U.S. foreign policy in the post WWII era.

The book was originally sent to me for my birthday (in April) by Adrian Scott (CEO of Ryze) but I just got to it now. The book was fascinating and riveting. Though 500 pages, I could not put it down and it was a great addition to my trip to Ukraine.

Summation: if you are interested in the evolvement of the post-Soviet states, I highly suggest you read this book.

Robin Wolaner publishes blog

Robin Wolaner publishes her new blog on her book (due in March 2005), Naked in the Boardroom.

Robin lives in SF and was the founder of Parenting Magazine.

Book: How to Survive Dating: By Hundreds of Happy Singles Who Did & Some Things to Avoid from a Few Broken Hearts Who Didn't (Hundreds of Heads Survival Guides)

Mark Bernstein and his company, Hundreds of Heads books, came out with their newest book: How to Survive Dating: By Hundreds of Happy Singles Who Did & Some Things to Avoid from a Few Broken Hearts Who Didn't (Hundreds of Heads Survival Guides)

this is another great book and a great job of marketing by Mark. My guess is the the "How to Survive" series will become as popular as the "Dummies" books.

Parmedia launches

There comes a point where we mistrust the media and begin the trust the masses. The wisdom of crowds suggests that though the masses might have a lot of noise, the agregate voice of the masses is generally more correct then the "experts."

The blogosphere is Media for the Masses 1.0. here milions of people report news, dissect news, distribute news. From business to politics to entertainment to sports to technology to … the masses rule. It started by the masses taking their cues from the media … now it can be argued that the media is taking its cues from the masses.

Media for the Masses 2.0 is the participatory media. Where thousands of amateurs become journalists -- filing stories, videos, photos, and sound. The first such sute that I have seen is ParMedia

which just launched this week. ParMedia, based in San Franicsco, wants to

create the world's largest gathering place of multi-media content and exchange of ideas that eliminates censorship, spin, and manipulation of content.

Essentially, anybody with an internet connection or a cellular phone can contribute any information of any type.

Chris Alden on The 100 Year Experiment: Coming to an end

Chris Alden blogs on The 100 Year Experiment: Coming to an end on the Lead21 blog.

it is a long read but i highly recommend anyone interested in the election outcome to look it over. Chris brilliantly goes over the 100 year experiment with social safety nets.

Books: Me Talk Pretty One Day

Link: Me Talk Pretty One Day by David Sedaris

this witty book is a good read -- but i would suggest you listen to the audio book as i did one day on a drive to and from upstate new york.

Sedaris is a great storyteller and is very funny. he's also very insightful about society and picks up on extremely humorous parts of life.